Aug 24

“Demand for high-quality video is on the rise across the Web from both our users and our advertisers,” Nicholas Ascheim, vice president of product management at NYTimes.com, said in a statement. “To meet this need, we have upgraded our technology, increased our production values, and given video even more prominence across the site.”

NYTimes.com already produces about 100 videos per month from well-known journalists like David Pogue. But with the announcement of its new platform, it looks like video will become an integral part of its strategy going forward as more original videos are produced each month.

NYTimes.com’s new video platform, which runs Brightcove 3, will display videos in 16×9 widescreen format and boast an individual playback page for each video to make it easier for visitors to find the videos they are looking for. More importantly, each video will now feature share tools, which will allow viewers to share the videos on sites like Digg, Facebook, and LinkedIn.

The videos will be presented in HD and made available to the home page, articles, blogs, and the site’s video library in an effort to make video a central part of The New York Times Co.’s overarching strategy.

NYTimes.com said Friday it has launched a new platform that will bring more video to more sections of the site.

Aug 24

PA Semi, acquired by Apple earlier this week, has been telling its former customers that Apple has no interest in its products, according to a report.

I can’t imagine that the deal would be overturned just because of a few complaints to the military, but Apple might be forced to figure out a way to transfer that portion of PA Semi’s assets to another chipmaker that could satisfy Uncle Sam’s need for the chips.

On Tuesday night, we learned that Apple was that company via a Forbes report that said the
Mac maker wanted to put PA Semi’s PWRficient processors in its
iPhone.

And that, apparently, could cause problems for Apple. The report says those contractors are going to complain about the acquisition to the U.S. Department of Defense.

EETimes is reporting that PA Semi started telling its customers in the military hardware industry that it was about to be acquired by a company that wanted only its intellectual property and employees.

The PWRficient processors are used in military systems built by defense contractors such as Raytheon and Lockheed Martin, companies reportedly annoyed by the possibility that the PWRficient processor might be coming to a quick end. According to EETimes, PA Semi told those contractors that after the acquisition, supply of the chips could not be guaranteed.

Aug 24

(Credit:
Dan Farber)

If you work YouTube’s new services into your Web site, your visitors can upload video directly to YouTube without leaving your site. You keep the page views–and their attention–and don’t have to pay for video hosting. Google, in turn, can presumably sell ads on your content. (Today’s announcement doesn’t say anything about ads/revenue sharing, so we’re assuming Google keeps all of the ad revenue in exchange for the free service.)

Dan Frommer over at Silicon Valley Insider has it right when he writes:

The decision to expand YouTube’s application programming interfaces is the smartest move by management since it agreed to lighten Eric Schmidt’s wallet to the tune of $1.6 billion in 2006.

YouTube’s not alone in thinking about how it can reinvent itself as a technology platform. Steve Rubel, who writes the Micro Persuasion blog, nails it:

Call it an educated hunch but I’m betting Google will try to cut a deal before that lawsuit ever gets close to going before a judge. After it reached a settlement in its antitrust case with the government, Microsoft spent billions to resolve lingering litigation against archenemies. That was coin well spent and it allowed Microsoft to get on with its business.

YouTube’s a social phenomenon that’s only getting bigger. Google knows what’s at stake.

The leading players on the Web all see the train coming. They are wisely creating APIs and turning themselves into plug-and-play services, not just big destinations. YouTube is just the latest to do so today. Amazon has S3. Google has OpenSocial and an extensive library of APIs. As does Microsoft. Facebook is allowing its applications to live outside the site. Twitter is an API first and (eventually) a business model second. Finally, the booming widget economy shows the promise of small content that can go anywhere.

I don’t want to get all giddy on you but this is a big deal. Instead of promoting YouTube as a destination site, this lays the groundwork for YouTube’s transformation into a video service. If it goes according to plan, the world starts building gobs more video products using YouTube’s infrastructure. YouTube’s corporate parent, Google, thus becomes the host for that much more of the world’s video. (Think about what that suggests in terms of indexing and monetizing potential.)

So what could screw this up? I can think of only one potential hitch. There are still a lot of bad feelings dividing content creators from Google/YouTube over copyright violation disputes. And don’t forget that Viacom’s $1 billion lawsuit hasn’t even entered the discovery stage.

With the announcement, developers get more direct access to the service while it also facilitates the proliferation of so-called “chromeless” players without the traditional YouTube interface and branding.

Eric Schmidt: YouTube everywhere? Why not?

Aug 24

It’s a good one and Dan is really entertaining. We talk about freetards, how he may or not have been a Microsoft shill and why Novell can’t get it right.

In the meantime check out some of the old episodes of Open Season.

Despite myriad technical difficulties we just got through recording Open Season Episode 12 with special guest Dan Lyons aka. Fake Steve Jobs.

Aug 24

Listen now:

Download today’s podcast

It’s hard to find an American print journalist who doesn’t also publish online, and most seem to now accept that blogging is here to stay. After witnessing the folding of the of the Rocky Mountain News and the print editions of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer along with struggles at other papers, it seems as if just about everyone realizes that the economics of print are–to say the least–challenging.

Tom and Larry talk about the audience reaction to their blogging panel and give some pointers on how it’s possible to be both a blogger and a good journalist.

But at an international technology conference on the island of Malta (in the Mediterranean, roughly halfway between Europe and Africa), CBS News and CNET technology analyst Larry Magid and CNET Executive Editor Tom Merritt came across some European and Asian technology journalists who felt a lot more secure about the future of print and more skeptical of online publishing than their American counterparts.

Aug 24

(Credit:
Dong Ngo)

When I first saw this video, I thought to myself “Cute, but jeez. Somebody must have a lot of time on their hands!” and I laughed it off. Then I ran into this USB Missile Launcher today, and I realized that I need to take these fun USB gizmos a bit less seriously. I mean, it’s hard to be serious and have fun at the same time!

If you don’t have the luxury of oblivious co-workers, don’t worry. The gizmo comes with a large-size target poster for you to practice. It works with any computer running Windows 2000/XP or Vista that has an available USB port.

Intimidating or not, the USB Missile Launcher is fun!

Peace out!

Boy, did I have fun with this little toy of war. You can steer it 360 degrees around and also up and down about 45 degrees. The bundled software that allows for controlling the missile launcher via a simulated launch pad makes a lot of noise each time you want to fire it. When you do fire the missiles, the software simulates the sound of a large explosion and depending on the volume of your speakers, it can be LOUD! However, what I’ve found I most like to do is turn off the sound and fire its three included foam missiles at my unsuspecting co-workers.

Aug 24

“We are happy that Judge Ware enforced the agreement settling our dispute with the ConnectU founders,” according to a statement from Facebook late Wednesday night. “ConnectU’s founders were represented by six lawyers and a professor at Wharton Business School when they signed the Settlement Agreement. The ConnectU founders understood the deal they made, and we are gratified that the Court rejected their false allegations of fraud. Their challenge was simply a case of ‘buyers remorse,’ as described by the Boston Court earlier this month.”

The Facebook statement continued: “We were disappointed that we had to litigate the settlement, as we believed we were caught in the middle of a fee dispute between ConnectU’s founders and its former counsel. Nevertheless, we can now consider this chapter closed and wish the Winklevoss brothers the best of luck in their future endeavors.”

Facebook, which is not publicly traded, did not deny that it had altered its valuation, but Ware deemed that the failure to disclose the change in valuation could not be considered fraudulent.

ConnectU’s legal team had alleged fraud on Facebook’s part for a number of reasons: one, because a forensic expert it hired had unearthed instant messaging logs that were relevant to the case and which had not been used as evidence prior to the settlement, and two, because they alleged that Facebook altered the value of its common stock between an October press release that pegged it at $15 billion, and February’s signing of the settlement term sheet.

Cameron Winklevoss and Tyler Winklevoss remain contenders for the U.S. rowing team that will compete in the Olympics in Beijing this summer.

The legal battle between the two social-networking sites has gone on since 2004, when ConnectU founders Cameron Winklevoss, Tyler Winklevoss, and Divya Narendra initially sued Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and several other early employees for allegedly stealing ConnectU’s code and business plan while they were all students at Harvard. Facebook countersued in 2005, claiming that ConnectU had hacked into its user database to mine e-mail addresses.

Both parties must still show up in court on July 2–a “speak now, or forever hold your peace” sort of occasion. But it appears that the public will remain shut out. Earlier this week, the same judge, James Ware of U.S. District Court in San Jose, Calif., opted to make the proceedings of the case private and keep court documents under seal. CNET News.com is evaluating a possible legal challenge to Ware’s decision, which keeps matters out of public view.

A U.S. District Court judge has decided to enforce the settlement that Facebook and would-be rival ConnectU signed in February, rejecting the ConnectU founders’ claims of fraud.

Aug 24

You can read more about the update on the gDocsBar blog. If you’ve got an earlier version of the extension installed, click on Tools > Add-ons then click the “check for updates” button.

In addition to these two updates, creator Sandosh Vasudevan has fixed some of the problems that plagued it when we first took a look. For instance, you can now create new documents right from the toolbar, as well as see and search through all of your docs without having to visit the Docs and Spreadsheets home.

Remember gDocsBar (download), that handy
Firefox extension we checked out a few months back? It got a pretty neat update today that lets you do things that might not have been originally intended for Google’s Documents and Spreadsheets service. The first is called Webclips, which is a fancy way of saying automatic copy and paste. If you find a big chunk of content you like, you can simple copy it, then drag it into the toolbar. gDocsBar will create a new document out of whatever you’ve highlighted, and preserve, as much as possible, the formatting and links.

The other new feature that power users are going to enjoy is templates. You can take any document you’ve made, or create a new one, and set it up to be a template in Google Docs. This will likely come in handy to spreadsheet junkies who repeatedly use a particular form or document with formulas built in. Using templates would save you some of the hassle of copying and pasting over the data from an existing spreadsheet and doing it again.

Make and re-use templates in Google Documents and Spreadsheets with the gDocsToolbar.

(Credit:
gDocsBar.com)

Aug 24

It’s not that I have a problem with RIM–I think the BlackBerry Curve is a fantastic device–or that I’m not impressed by the Storm. I just don’t see how BlackBerry’s first touchscreen device can compete against the iPhone if the vast majority of “mainstream” users simply don’t know anything about it.

OK, I guess I can concede that the Storm is really neat and the touchscreen idea is fantastic. But I still don’t see how the BlackBerry Storm will be able to compete on any level with the iPhone 3G.

Tech journalists and gadget lovers across the globe are rejoicing over the announcement of the BlackBerry Storm, RIM’s first touchscreen cell phone to compete with the
iPhone.

Apple has help with every product it releases, but RIM doesn’t have that luxury. So no matter how great the Storm will be, it doesn’t matter.

Check out Don’s Digital Home podcast, Twitter feed, and FriendFeed.

Those who can’t wait to get their hands on BlackBerry’s latest call it a marvel and its keyboard functionality, which makes you press down on the screen to register a “touch”, is something worth drooling over.

In contrast, the iPhone wasn’t a mystery to anyone once Steve Jobs showed it off at his Stevenote. The mainstream media was in attendance to see what he had up its sleeve and reported on every last detail. On launch day, every single major media outlet was chomping at the bit to cover the cell phone industry’s latest and greatest offering.

Will that happen with the BlackBerry Storm? Uh, no. Instead, the Storm will be covered by a select few media outlets in the middle of a newscast and quickly forgotten about after that. There won’t be local stations covering lines around the Verizon store and even when it’s released, the average person probably won’t know about it.

So how does RIM fight the Apple onslaught and the mainstream media that only cares about Steve Jobs?

And that’s where RIM finds itself now. The BlackBerry Storm is an incredibly appealing device in its own right and slowly, but surely, the device will make its way into the mainstream as reports break out about its functionality and usability, but until that happens, it’s a mystery to the average user.

All RIM can do is keep releasing compelling products that make businesses and the tech-savvy crowd take notice and wait for that knowledge to trickle-down into the mainstream. Sure, it won’t be easy, but it needs to be done.

Go ahead and ask the person next to you at the office about the BlackBerry Storm. Chances are, if they aren’t in to technology like you and I, they wouldn’t have the slightest clue about it even though it’s making headlines all over the tech world today.

Do you see what I’m getting at here? No matter how important a new device in the cell phone business may be to the growth of the industry, it will never be able to outshine the iPhone.

It can’t.

It’s sad, but true.

Then ask those people what they knew about the iPhone the day after it was announced. I’ll bet you’ll find that they knew much more about the iPhone than the BlackBerry Storm.

Aug 24

Unlike regional networks, which have multiple fiber rings running through and between cities, undersea cables that connect continents do not have this type of redundant architecture because it’s much too expensive to build it that way. This means that undersea cables are particularly vulnerable to fiber cuts. But because they are deployed beneath the ocean floor, they tend to be more difficult to tamper with. That said, cables are severed and massive outages do occur from time to time.

I talked to a few experts about how telecommunications networks are built and how they operate. And I’ve concluded that while it’s somewhat easy to figure out where fiber is laid and to gain access to the fiber infrastructure in the ground, it’s much harder to actually cause major damage unless you know what you’re doing.

This is also why Greenholtz believes that the AT&T fibers were likely cut by someone who knew the network and its potential weaknesses.

But knowing exactly which manhole cover to open and which cables to cut that would cause widespread damage to the network is another story.

Let me explain. In the AT&T fiber cut case, it was fairly easy for the perpetrator to access the fiber-optic cables that were eventually cut. Sgt. Lopez said that it appeared that whoever cut the fibers simply lifted the manhole cover, went down the ladder, and cut two cables.

“If you really want to take down the communications network and cause damage, you’d probably target a central office,” Greenholtz said.

“The manhole covers are not locked,” he said. “Anybody can open them and go down there. But most of these networks have redundancy and diversity built-in to the architecture, so if you cut a cable, it reroutes itself and recovers.”

An inside job?
Indeed, AT&T’s network failure seems to suggest that at least one other path that would have rerouted the traffic was also damaged or cut. Given that the police indicated that the incidents occurred in only two locations, San Jose and San Carlos, it seems likely that there was already some damage or issue happening on AT&T’s network at the time the fiber was cut or the vandals managed to cut the ring in two places.

But Johnson also said that the union was not involved in the vandalism and that claims that its members might be involved are unfounded.

A central office is the nerve center of a telecommunications network. It houses all the switching equipment and billing data for a particular region of the network. As an example, Greenholtz said that if a terrorist was able to damage Verizon’s central office on 38th Street in Manhattan, communications services on Wall Street could be wiped out not just for a few hours, but likely for days, weeks, or even a month. Because these facilities are so critical, he said all the major phone companies have tight security.

AT&T also said in a press release that following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, its networks were declared National Critical Infrastructures, which means that anyone who tampers with, destroys, or disrupts the company’s network or its components is in violation of both federal and state laws.

But the phone companies also typically ran redundant lines that are spaced some distance apart from each other, so that if one line is cut, there is also a separate fiber carrying the traffic. And to ensure that the redundant line can handle excess traffic in an emergency, most phone companies run these systems at 50 percent capacity.

And some have even gone so far as to suggest that the perpetrator could be an unhappy union worker. AT&T is currently in contract negotiations with its largest union the Communications Workers of America, which represents some 80,000 workers at AT&T. Workers have already voted to strike if a new contract can’t be agreed upon. So far, no date has been set for a strike, and Candice Johnson, a spokeswoman for the union said that the two sides are still negotiating.

Of course, neither I nor any other expert could know this for sure. But the fact is that fibers are cut all the time in regional networks, and rarely do they cause massive outages that shut down entire regions for hours. Most of these incidents are accidents. Someone might be landscaping a yard and a back-hoe severs a cable. Or another utility worker accidentally damages a cable while working in the same manhole where communication cables are located.

Wondering about vulnerabilities
Still, with recent reports that our nation’s electrical grid has gotten less secure due to technological advances, incidents such as this one leaves many wondering how vulnerable the communications network really is.

“We are aggressively working with law enforcement authorities to see that those responsible for this willful act are apprehended and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,” the company said in a statement Friday.

“There is no basis for speculation that our members were involved in this act of vandalism,” she said. “We are cooperating with authorities. We are currently at the bargaining table with AT&T management, and our workers are on the job. Our goal is to get a contract renewed.”

The fiber-optic cables that were cut in San Carlos, which were owned by Sprint Nextel, appear to have worked in this way. The traffic was quickly rerouted to another path, and service to Sprint’s business customers was not interrupted.

AT&T is offering a $250,000 reward to anyone who can provide information that leads to the arrest and conviction of the vandals.

“A couple of well-placed attacks could do a lot of damage to the communications network,” said Sam Greenholtz, co-founder and principal of Telecom Pragmatics, a consulting and research firm specializing in the telecommunications market. “And it’s not really that hard to figure out where the fiber optic cables are laid and to get access to them.”

The San Jose Police Department is investigating the incidents, which took place in two different locations in San Jose and San Carlos and classified as acts of vandalism. Now that the network is up and running again, people are asking how difficult is it to take down the nation’s communications network? And should we be more worried about the fiber optic cables that ring our communities and crisscross the country carrying all of our communications?

“Fiber cuts happen more often than people realize,” said Crystal Davis, a spokeswoman for Sprint Nextel. “It happens by accident all the time when someone is drilling or digging up a street. Or they’re doing regular maintenance. We know this, and that’s why traffic can be quickly rerouted.”

Regardless of whether the cables were cut by disgruntled employees or random vandals, the recent incident highlights the potential for such an attack to be undertaken on a broader scale by foreign terrorists, who may infiltrate our nation’s telephone companies or gain access to information about the country’s communications network. But Greenholtz and other experts say that because these networks have always been built with redundancy in mind, it would take a massive coordinated effort to target individual manholes and to cut fibers.

A simple snip of a few fiber-optic communications cables left thousands of people in Silicon Valley and throughout parts of the San Francisco Bay Area without phone, Internet, or wireless service for more than 12 hours on Thursday.

“The more traffic there is on the route, the more redundancy the carrier provides,” he said. “There are usually two aspects to a backup plan for networks. One is providing a diversity of virtual routes for the traffic, but the other is providing physically separate routes on separate fibers. I’d have to say the outage that occurred in Silicon Valley seems odd, given the traditional network architecture.”

Sgt. Lopez from the San Jose Police Department said that it’s still too early in the investigation to talk about suspects or motives.

Greenholtz, who was a former manager in the Planning and Engineering Group at Verizon where he worked for nearly 28 years, said that causing a network outage of this magnitude was likely orchestrated by someone who not only knew which manholes provided access to AT&T fibers, but also knew which places on the network were most vulnerable and could cause the most damage.

(Credit:
Google Maps)

By contrast, some networks in highly trafficked regions or networks that service critical customers have even more redundancy built into them. Michael Howard, a principal analyst at telecommunications research firm Infonetics Research, said that carriers such as Deutsche Telekom have begun building meshed networks so that there is a third path for traffic if fibers are cut or there is some other disruption on the network.

“If there was an ongoing maintenance issue on one side of the fiber ring that hadn’t been addressed,” he said. “And then the other side is cut, it would cause a major outage like the one AT&T experienced. But in order to cause that much damage, someone would have to know that. Otherwise, it was just a very lucky vandal.”

Built in rings
AT&T declined to discuss specifics of the company’s network architecture, but experts say that the Baby Bell phone companies, such AT&T’s predecessor SBC Communications, typically built their regional fiber networks in rings. The rings themselves would help provide protection against an outage, because if a line were cut, the traffic could just reverse itself in less than 50 milliseconds and go the other direction around the ring.

More theories
This line of thinking has caused some bloggers to suspect that the vandal was a disgruntled former or current AT&T employee.

Greenholtz explained that someone with knowledge of the network would know the most vulnerable points in the network and could pinpoint those areas.

“Those places have tons of security,” he said. “You’d probably need Jack Bauer (of the TV show ‘24′) to help you get in there.”

That said, Sgt. Ronnie Lopez of the San Jose Police Department said there is no reason yet to suspect terrorism in this case. But the FBI has been briefed on the case.

« Previous Entries Next Entries »